San Bernardino Superior Judge Nicole Quintana Winter overruled the majority of Redlands’ request to disqualify Coyote Aviation’s lawsuit on June 11.
by Aidan McGloin
Following a glitched virtual bar exam, the California Senate passed a request on May 28 to audit the bar exam.
by Aidan McGloinAttorney General Rob Bonta filed suit June 12 against a family that owns 3,243 residential properties, or 9,930 individual units, in the Inland Empire. After a three-year investigation, Bonta claims the Nijjar family’s companies violated multiple California laws.
by Aidan McGloin
A federal appeals court is allowing President Donald Trump’s deployment of California National Guard soldiers to continue while it considers Trump’s challenge to a lower court’s decision that found he illegally mobilized those troops without consulting Gov. Gavin Newsom.
by Aidan McGloin
Good morning. Thank you for reading Inland Empire Law Weekly’s first Sunday publication. Your early subscription gives validation to my efforts. Every week, your subscription will get you access to locally reported articles on the San Bernardino and Riverside superior court systems. I intend for this publication to be
by Aidan McGloin
The California 4th District Court of Appeal, Division Two, upheld Redlands’ eviction of hangar rental company Coyote Aviation from their municipal airport in a June 5 published opinion. The ruling does not end the ongoing legal battle between the company and the city. A separate lawsuit from Coyote Aviation challenges
by Aidan McGloinGovernment defendant * Ruben Mejia v. The State of California (5:25-cv-01396): Civil Rights Act. California Central District Judge Fernando Olguin presides. * Lillie Palush v. County of Riverside (5:25-cv-01410): Civil Rights Act. California Central District Judge David Bristow presides. Civil Rights Act * Kevin Realworldfare v. Naji Doumit (5:25-cv-01357): Civil
by Aidan McGloinThe California Supreme Court announced May 30 that it will review the Riverside case Maniago v. Desert Cardiology Consultants’ Medical Group. The announcement of the case acceptance posed the following question: "Is a voluntary dismissal with prejudice an appealable order if it was entered after an adverse ruling by
by Aidan McGloin